Is it a battle of trust between old and new media?
Some time ago I wrote an article describing a technique that 'the authorities' use when someone with integrity in the public eye challenges their stories.
The truth puts them on the defensive and rather than risk having an open debate where their lies risk being exposed, their opponents are slandered, and branded as anti-Semitic, racist or xyz-phobic.
Another technique is to dig up something about their opponent’s past behaviour and pay top lawyers millions of $$$$ to build a case to destroy them. I believe this could be what is happening to Russell Brand.
Russell has really built up a considerable public following over the
past 2 years and gone from being a 'nuisance' to 'the authorities’, who hoped he would go away, to now being a major pain in the arse for them.
It is this timing that makes me suspicious.
Why now and not 5 years ago, or 4, 3 or even 2? I believe the mainstream media wants him silenced because of what he is saying to the world about what is going on.
But these accusations are serious and need to be seriously looked into.
I envisage there will be one of three outcomes for Russell:
he will have a fair trial in court and be judged innocent, exposing the fabrication of the 'authorities'.
he will be judged guilty and receive the sentences such offences deserve.
he will do a 'Prince Andrew' and pay millions to the prosecution to keep the truth from being discovered in Court.
Whichever way it works out, my deepest sympathies and support go to those who have been genuine victims of the allegations against Russell. However, I do feel