A witness statement by former vice president of Pfizer, Dr Mike Yeadon to the Corona Investigative Committee revealed a shocking claim that the COVID mRNA are designed to experiment on the human race and to find out what dosage of a yet unknown toxin is needed in order to kill people. This may seem like an incredible and implausible statement, but an analysis conducted by Dr Craig Paardekooper of Kingston University London also suggests that under joint direction three companies conspired to plan and execute another Holocaust. What this means is that our governments have coerced the people into playing Russian Roulette with the so-called vaccine and as Dr Robert Yoho of Surviving Healthcare states, “If you play Russian Roulette by spinning a six-shot revolver's cylinder using one bullet, your chance of dying is one in six. If you play Covid vax roulette, your chance of dying or being mortally wounded is about one in 200!” (source).

Are we expected to believe that our government has, in lockstep with other nations’ leaders, attempted to coerce the entire population into playing a lethal game of Russian Roulette under the guise of protecting us all from a deadly virus?

The Corona Committee

The Corona Investigative Committee led by lawyer Reiner Füllmich has collated extensive evidence and testimonies from experts around the world in preparation for an international lawsuit against the perpetrators of the Crimes Against Humanity. The lawyers also believe that the producers of the so-called vaccines are experimenting with the correct dosages to kill people. According to Dr Füllmich, there is compelling evidence for punitive damages and attempted mass murder and says, “they are intentionally killing people […] the main goal with the injections all over the world is global depopulation.” The investigative committee are now no longer in doubt that the poisoning and mass murder through the so-called vaccines is intentionally being perpetrated on the people of the world. They have a strong case as their claims have also been supported by numerous global experts (source).

Mike Yeadon’s Testimony

One expert to give his testimony was Dr Michael Yeadon, an industry veteran of the biopharmaceutical industry with previous clearance from the official secrets act in Portadown, with a degree in biochemistry and toxicology. Yeadon worked within Pfizer where he was head of respiratory research worldwide, and the chief scientific officer. He has also had extensive experience in biotech consultation, has his own company and is also vice president of Pfizer. Doctor Yeadon is therefore an expert in this field and was able to tell the committee that the “mortality rate linked to the vaccines is traceable in terms of lot numbers of the different batches, as some batches appear to be more lethal than others.” He also claims the lot numbers of some shots of the brands Moderna, Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer/BioNTech are related to much higher mortality than for the other manufacturers.

“Different numbers on the barcodes on the bottom of the vaccine doses are placebo which has been given to politicians according to a Slovenian chief nurse. Is it the same in other countries?”

– Yeadon

From Mike Yeadon’s Testimony to the Corona Committee

Pfizer Systematic Deployment in USA

Mike Yeadon had referred to another damning piece of evidence which would support his claim which is from a British scientist Dr Paardekooper of Kingston University of London, who conducted an extensive analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data. The purpose of the study according to Paardekooper was to determine if there is any significant variation in batch toxicity.

He examined all manufactured vaccines – Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), etc. He found that among every 200 batches of the vaccine from Pfizer and other makers, one batch of the 200 was found to be over 50 x more deadly than vaccines batches from other lots. The other vaccine lots (batches) were also causing deaths and disabilities, but nowhere near to this extent. These deadly batches should have appeared randomly among all '“vaccines” if it was an unintentional event. However, he found that 5% of the vaccines were responsible for 90% of the serious adverse events, including deaths.

The incidence of deaths and serious complications among these “hot lots” varied from over 1000% to several thousand per cent higher than comparable safer lots. All lots of a vaccine are numbered, for example, Moderna labels them with codes such as 013M20A. It was noted that batches ending in 20A were much more toxic than the ones ending in 21A. The batches ending in 20A had about 1700 adverse events, versus a few hundred to twenty or thirty events for the 21A batches. This example explains why some people had few or no adverse events after taking the vaccine while others are either killed or severely and permanently harmed.

(sources). Please watch the video on BitChute here.

Hot Lots in Wyeth

Too many people dying in close proximity after a vaccine would probably raise the alarm, therefore the best way to disguise the fact would be to spread the “hot lots” across a wider geographical area.

This is what happened in 1978 -1979 with Wyeth Pharma when eleven babies were found to have died within eight days of a Diphtheria Tetanus and Polio (DTP) vaccination when the hot lots ended up in one state. Nine of the eleven babies had been vaccinated with the same lot of pertussis vaccine, Wyeth #64201 and five (four from the same lot) had died within twenty-four hours of vaccination. The cause of the infant deaths was immediately evident, but the response from the manufacturer, however, was not to remove the obviously deadly batches of vaccine, instead, they ordered the remaining hot lots to be scattered across the nation to prevent the authorities from seeing the blatant deadly effect.

Following the deaths that were obviously more than a coincidence, Wyeth penned a memo showing their decision to prevent a clustering of deaths following DPT vaccination from a single lot from ever occurring again in a single geographical area.’ purposefully manufactured and sent across the nation—usually vaccines designed for children (source). Notably, Pfizer acquired Wyeth in 2009 (source). How Bad is My Batch?

Died Suddenly

These deaths would be classified as being “cot deaths” or sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) which is the sudden and unexpected death of a baby where no cause is found according to the Lullaby Trust. The trust makes a disgraceful claim that vaccinating your baby reduces the risk of SIDS, they should not make such a statement when there is no evidence to support their claim. The same is happening with sudden adult deaths which we are now hearing so much of. SADS, the sudden adult death syndrome, has become a global, widespread phenomenon yet much of the medical industry and the government are apparently baffled as to why this is happening. The ‘Died Suddenly’ Covid-19 vaccine documentary, released in late 2022 by the Stew Peters Network, was watched by 7 million people within 24 hours of its release. We should be able to assume that both members of the government and medical industry would have taken an interest to help clarify the reasons for these deaths. They have had more than enough time to work out why these deaths have been occurring.

The Ignored Vaccine Deaths

Adverse reactions following mRNA jabs began early on after the start of the jab rollout. This should have been enough to halt the administration of the vaccine, as should the 42,553 deaths within 21 days of a COVID vaccine in England alone which was recorded by the Office of National Statistics (ONS), And the 8,720 death of people aged 12 and over 28 days after receiving a vaccine in Scotland between December 2020 and February 2022 (source). Even the figures from the UK Government’s own “early warning system” the Y ellow Card Scheme which confirmed 2,330 adverse events with fatal outcomes following the mRNA vaccine were ignored. Why would this be?

We were expected to believe that the government cared for the people when they said “if we could save just one person’s life it would be worth it, but the same people are ignoring thousands of deaths from the vaccine (source). The feigned ignorance that the vaccine is deadly, is enough reason to suspect the government of deliberately and knowingly promoting the blanket genocidal jab.

Excess Deaths Globally

They are ignoring the huge percentage of excess deaths in the UK following the vaccine rollout, which for 2022 was 9% more than in 2019. This is well over 60,000 excess deaths! If this number of deaths had occurred in any other tragic circumstances, it would have been big news, but we’re not seeing the media or government concern despite the fact that these excess deaths are occurring around the world all at the same time! Why do they not find this alarming, particularly looking at the percentages from Germany, Netherlands and Denmark? Clearly, there is something to be concerned about. It should be concerning to all that even ONS has not published data on deaths following vaccines since May 2022. Why are the government not showing figures to illustrate how effective the jab is? If it was they would.

The Government Refuses to Investigate

Unbelievably, the government does not seem at all concerned with data or figures for excess deaths. This was seen as recently as the 24th of January 2023, and after months of unexplained excess deaths, Member of Parliament Esther McVey MP asked the Government’s Chief Medical Officer whether “His Majesty’s Government was investigating or was planning to do so.” The response from the medical officer was evasive and evidence-free. According to Dr Heneghan the Oxford Professor of Evidence-Based Medicine accused the minister of waffling when she responded that the cause of excess deaths was a “lack of access to cardiovascular drugs, blood pressure monitoring and cancer services” the first two Heneghan says are evidence-free statements he says adding that she cited the usual F Word (flu) and C Word (Covid) plus some waffle.” Why is there a refusal by the government to investigate?

The Rebranded Flu

The fact that the government are wilfully blind to the obvious lethality of the mRNA is very suspect. Even prior to the rollout campaign we so-called “antivaxxers” voiced concerns and suspicions when it had become increasingly obvious that we were being fed an unremitting chain of lies, distortions and disinformation by the government, media, public health officials, medical bureaucracies (FDA and WHO) and medical associations. The televised daily COVID data was exaggerated at best and obviously used to incite fear in the masses, but it was blatantly apparent that the virus was no more deadly than the flu. As the reported COVID deaths were allegedly increasing, flu deaths were decreasing from that of the previous years as if they rebranded the flu and classified numerous other deaths “COVID.” Deaths with no relation to the “novel virus” whatsoever, were being classified as “COVID” if there was a pandemic, why was this necessary? This raised suspicions as to why there was a need for a rushed-through vaccine.

Medical Nonconformists

Suspicions were also raised and voiced due to shutting down and censoring across all social media platforms of discussions of natural immunity or even safe alternative treatments for the virus such as Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine, and the mainstream media never mentioned alternatives posed by experts other than their own chosen few. Physicians, scientists, and experts in infectious treatments who dared to offer to develop more effective and safer treatments were also censored, even though prior to the “pandemic” we would have seen admiration for their efforts, yet we witnessed them being frequently demonized, harassed, shamed and humiliated. Some even lost their licenses and hospital privileges and one doctor in particular, physician Dr Meryl Nass, who has expertise in bioterrorism, not only lost her license but was also made to have a psychiatric evaluation before her reinstatement was granted (source).

Conformity

Nothing but conformity was accepted by those in control who have continually demanded it and pushed for obedience to a medical establishment represented by political appointees, according to Logan Albright from the Brownstone Institute. Albright recognises the “pitched hostility towards any solution other than the ‘official’ one.” Again, this was to raise the alarm for scientists and laypeople alike, that something untoward was occurring as without real evidence that a pandemic had even existed, there was a certain unnecessary urgency for this “experimental vaccine.” This, however, did not stop the millions queuing up for the jab that was given emergency use authorisation (EUA), they were the voluntary lab rats who trusted the government who were continually spouting the “safe and effective” tag line. Yet there was no proof at all that it was “safe” and what was it supposed to be effective at?

Russian Roulette Using Injections

As a measure to prevent a novel virus, it was neither safe nor effective. This has been no surprise to many of us as since the beginning of the COVID era we have been subjected to ridiculous lies proving the orchestrators of the plandemic to be disingenuous. Why then would we trust them to inject us with an experimental toxic cocktail? We were right to refuse it, as now their subsequent pathetic attempts from our government to dismiss the deaths following the mRNA experiment as COVID and flu, without feeling the need to investigate these deaths would lead us to believe that there is a deliberate attempt on our lives. According to Dr Robert Malone, “what’s been deployed has been basically the technology and capabilities that were designed to respond to terrorism, but they’ve been deployed against the likes of you, me” We are inclined to agree, and yes, we believe that choosing the jab is akin to playing a game of Russian Roulette!

Research by Patricia Harrity

Have We Been Coerced into Playing a Game of Russian Roulette?