Experimental COVID-19 vaccines from pharmaceutical companies were touted as being “safe and effective” for the prevention of transmission of COVID and given Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) back in December 2020. Early on in the vaccine campaign, it was evident the vaccines were not safe, yet this fact was ignored by leaders and policymakers who continued administering it regardless.

The Cides believe that those still pushing for individuals to have the jab already knew that it was dangerous and had caused adverse effects and deaths. Therefore this intervention has been a deliberate crime against humanity.

Back in early December 2020, three experimental COVID-19 vaccines from pharmaceutical companies Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2 AKA), AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1) and Moderna (mRNA-1279) were authorised for a worldwide administration for the alleged prevention of COVID-19. In the UK the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) authorised two mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, the Pfizer and Moderna products which they said demonstrated “safety and efficacy” in clinical trials and were granted emergency use authorisation (EUA) by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) while also giving blanket immunity from liability through this EUA to the Pharmaceutical companies (source). The vaccines were then marketed to the UK and worldwide population as being “safe and effective”.

Support for this vaccine campaign has been increasingly waning now that more people have found that the vaccines were anything but “safe and effective.” A Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Christine Anderson (among many others), has recently said that the “vaccine campaign will go down as the biggest scandal in medical history, and moreover, it will be known as the biggest crime ever committed on humanity.”

If we look at the events of the months following the campaign, we can only agree with her.

The mRNA Experiment

First of all, the vaccine, or more precisely the mRNA gene therapy, was seemingly rushed into production and was still in the experimental stage when it was decided, as Matt Hancock said to jab “hope” into everyone’s arms. Although emergency use authorisation (EUA), was granted, stage three clinical trials had not been completed and the data for some endpoints were not due to be collected for another 24 months after injection (source Mercola).

Remarkably, the rollout still commenced, despite the fact that officials at the WHO’s virtual press conference on Dec. 28, 2020, said there were no guarantees that the vaccine would even prevent people from being infected or transmitting the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

What this meant was that every vaccinated individual was a human guinea pig in an ongoing medical experiment. Additionally, the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines were themselves part of an experimental class of injection that has never before been given to the public before.

Messenger RNA

The difference is that ordinarily, vaccines seek to introduce an immunogen into the body, this is in contrast to the mRNA vaccine which seeks to introduce messenger RNA into the body to trick the body’s cells into producing immunogens that are supposed to stimulate an immune response. Although there was no long-term data to determine any potentially serious side effects, as early as December 2020 reports had shown that Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine contained polyethylene glycol (PEG). Studies have shown that 70% of people develop antibodies against PEG which suggested that with it being in the vaccine it could trigger fatal allergic reactions. This led to warning s that people with known allergies should not take the Pfizer vaccine, but following this warning anaphylactic reactions were reported by recipients of the Moderna mRNA vaccine as well (source).

Whatever Happened to – ‘My Body – My Choice’?

Due to the fact that it’s an experimental intervention, not a typical vaccine, and has been known to cause fatal reactions, it could and should be assumed that individuals could choose whether or not to take part in this trial. Particularly as it was for a disease with more than a 99% survival rate (even going by the government's official inflated figures). Alas, we were unethically subjected to pressure to submit to the experimental, invasive medical procedure through fear, coercion and mandates. Those who refused the treatment or warned others of the potential dangers were vilified and dismissed as “antivaxxers.”

Early Warning Systems Were Ignored

This occurred despite actual evidence that the vaccines were causing adverse reactions and deaths following the COVID jab, which had been ignored by the orchestrators of the vaccine campaign. The US and the UK government's own “proactive strategy” to continually monitor vaccine safety has shown the overwhelming and historically unprecedented quantity of reports of COVID vaccine adverse events since early on in the rollout that even the layperson has access to. The US has the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) which had reports of over 16,000 deaths resulting from the “safe and effective” COVID jab in just the first 9 months (Health and Services 2021). The Note below even appears on the USA VAERS webpage.

The UK equivalent of VAERS, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has the Yellow Card scheme, which informs us that the true number of cases reported to the scheme is underreported with only 2-4% of all ADRs and 10% of serious reactions to a pharma product actually being reported! It is even more alarming therefore that by September 2021, nine months after the commencement of the vaccine campaign, 1,135,579 adverse events, and 1,559 deaths had been reported to have been caused by the experimental vaccine.

Apparently, these schemes essentially act as an early warning system. They are able to review the reports to ensure the perceived benefits of drugs or vaccines outweigh any possible side effects.

Why didn’t they do this?

****Note that these are only those that are voluntarily reported.***
*Also note the total injuries for other medical products range between 21 years and 53 years, for example, there have been 272,000 adverse reactions to flu vaccines since 1968, but the figure for the Covid 'vaccines' are only since the 'vaccine' rollouts in December of 2020, less than one year.

WHO Knew

Clearly, with statistics from the government’s own organisations such as ONS, VAERS, and the Yellow Card system our government knew and yes, the WHO knew.

The data in this chart was compiled from VigiAccess, the WHOs global database of "reported potential side effects of medicinal products".

Scientific Studies Were Ignored

With clear data showing that the vaccine was dangerous, it should have been withdrawn instead, the powers-that-be turned a blind eye. They ignored dissenting voices and the many scientific studies which highlighted at best the inefficacy of the vaccine.

One study in particular conducted by Beattie of the University of Alberta in 2021 reported that countries recording the fewest COVID-19 deaths in 2020 before vaccinations, experienced “hundreds or thousands of percentage increases in total deaths” after COVID-19 vaccinations were introduced and calculated that 89.84% of the 145 countries studied experienced a negative impact. The trend lines on the Gompertz Function scale began to unnaturally increase in many countries towards the end of summer where usually there is a downward trend as the usual seasonal die-off from pneumonia, influenza, or even COVID-19 is in the winter, meaning that it is highly suspect that the increase is vaccine-induced. Beattie concluded that the “statistically overwhelmingly positive causal impact after vaccine deployment on the total deaths and total cases per million should be “highly worrisome for policymakers” (source). Evidently, it was not worrisome at all.

Scientists Were Ignored

Studies such as the Beattie one was ignored and so too were other dissenting voices which were intensifying. Criticism over the vaccines was met with calls from politicians, health professionals, journalists, and in turn, the public to take harsh measures against so-called “anti-vaxxers.” Although data and evidence said otherwise, they were accused of spreading “fake news” and “endangering public health.” Even when those dissenting voices came from professionals such as physicians, nurses, and researchers involved with vaccines through practice and/or research.

A study showed the variety of tactics they had been subjected to with the intention of suppressing and silencing their oppositional position on vaccines. The main suppression tactics as perceived and reported by these professionals included:

Publication of defamatory statements against them,
Paper retractions
Denial of research grants
Calls for dismissal and in some cases summonses to hearings
Suspension of their medical license by the country’s Ministry of Health
Self-censorship (fear of repercussions for expressing critical opinions).
Family doctors (GPs) and nurses reported pressure to vaccinate patients from the Ministry of Health (source).

The author of the study concluded that “Suppression of dissent impairs scientific discourse and research while creating the false impression of scientific consensus.”

The masses were fooled into believing they were “following the science”, they were however only following a select few who adhered to the narrative.

Wilfully Blind Policymakers

Policymakers were still intent on inflicting the mRNA experimental treatment on the entire population even though by September 2021 it was clear that the experiment failed, the data was in and the mRNA jabs were not “safe nor effective” but they were also fatally dangerous.

The orchestrators of the campaign did not withdraw the “vaccine” as we would expect, instead:

Changed the Definition of “vaccine”

A vaccine once was, “Injection of a killed or weakened infectious organism in order to prevent the disease” (source). In 2015 it became, “The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.” (source). In September 2021, after recent failure was evident, the definition changed to, “The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease” (source).

Ignored the Statistics and Excess Deaths of Children

They began to be recorded in week 22 of 2021 coinciding with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) announcing on the 8th of May 2021 that their human medicines committee (CHMP) recommended granting an extension of indication for the COVID-19 vaccine Comirnaty (Pfizer) to include use in children aged 12 to 15.

Ignored the Dangerous Side Effects

CHMP posited that “the benefits of the jab outweighed the risks” this was simply untrue (see right from the Children’s Health Defense (CHD).

Ignored post-vaccine Myocarditis

CHMP advised that their safety committee the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) were assessing cases of post-Comirnaty (Pfizer) vaccine Myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle causing damage to the muscle cell) and Pericarditis (inflammation of the membrane around the heart) which occurred mainly in young people under 30 years old. The PRAC said that these occurrences were “very rare” and “there was no indication that these cases were due to the vaccine.

Again this is not true, one study alone demonstrates incidences in approximately 1 in 2700 in boys following the Pfizer product. However, many more peer-reviewed studies also exist source 1 and many references.

An Attempt to Normalise Heart Attacks and Strokes

Still the PRAC along with the orchestrators trivialised the side effect which they said were “mild and moderate” and included pain at the injection site, tiredness, headache, muscle and joint pain, chills and fever”.

The British media also trivialised the adverse effects and even attempted to normalise the excess heart attacks and strokes which were apparently caused by everything but the jab.

UK Vaccine Damage Created Job Opportunities

Nonetheless, it would appear that the government were awaiting the onslaught of vaccine damage requests when job vacancies for caseworkers helping to signpost COVID vaccine victims started appearing. They were put to work and in June 2022, the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) a government-funded initiative, made what is thought to be the very first payment to an individual harmed by a COVID vaccine in the UK (source).

But the one-off payment of a measly £120,000 is not a ‘compensation scheme’ according to the VDPS, although it is offered to people who have been left severely disabled as a result of a vaccination!

They Were Still Not Done

Unbelievably with all the data available, certainly by September 2021, that evidenced that the mRNA experiment was dangerous, they were still intent on jabbing the world. Their refusal to act upon the data saw the FDA panel voting to recommend the authorisation of the Pfizer vaccine for children between 5 and 11 years old! Remarkably, when asked if “Based on the totality of scientific evidence available, do the benefits of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine when administered as a 2-dose series outweigh its risks for use in children 5-11 years of age?”

The FDA advisory committee admitted that it won’t be known until it begins being administered. Dr Eric Rubin of Harvard university admitted “We’re never going to learn how safe the vaccine is unless we start giving it, and that’s just the way it goes.”

But we did know it was not safe, the FDA certainly seemed to know as did Pfizer.

The Pfizer Documents the FDA Wanted Hidden

This was apparent when a group named the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency containing more than 30 professors and scientists made a freedom of information request (FOIA) to the federal government to share all data that factored into the agency’s hasty decision to grant Pfizer’s experimental mRNA vaccine an emergency use authorization (EUA).

Initially, the FDA attempted to hide that information which amounts to 329,000 documents and challenged the FOIA in court. Eventually, the agency was ordered to release the documents and seemed reluctant to comply and asked for 55 years to process the request!

If it were to take until 2076 to process the data at 500 pages a month, how on earth did the FDA have time to analyse it in the first place in order to deem it safe?

The Pfizer Documents

It seems the whole 329,00 pages were not even needed as it was obvious it was not safe even within the first batch of documents released by the FDA which were enough to know that the FDA should never have authorised the Pfizer product.

In just one document Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Records Reports, it is evident that in just the first 90 days of the vaccine’s rollout under the FDA’s EUA – from December 1st. 2020 – February 28th, 2021 – there were TENS OF THOUSANDS of reported adverse reactions, including over 1200 deaths!

New Horrifying Data

Fast forward almost a year, and we can see the effects of ignoring the not-so-safe and effective vaccine, particularly due to the July 2022 data reported by the Office of National Statistics (ONS). The data has been analysed and published by the Expose who highlighted what they term “a whole host of horrifying data on deaths by vaccination status in England,” between 1st Jan 2021 and 31st May 2022 which are the government’s own official figures.

According to the ONS data following Covid-19 vaccination:

1 in every 482 Covid-19 vaccinated people died within one month
1 in every 246 Covid-19 vaccinated people in England died within 60 days
1 in every 73 Covid-19 vaccinated people were dead by May 2022 (source)

European Monitoring

Also EuroMOMO, the European mortality monitoring activity published shocking figures. The collated weekly statistics on mortality provided by 29 European countries or subnational regions confirmed that there were more excess deaths in 2022 across Europe than in 2020 which was at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic.

EuroMOMO is an organisation who say they aim to “detect and measure excess deaths related to seasonal influenza, pandemics and other public health threats” but their report also shows that following the Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) of the COVID vaccine a huge number of deaths occurred in 2021.

Despite EuroMOMO being hosted by Statens Serum Institut, Denmark, and supported by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the World Health Organisation (WHO), they were all quiet about this fact and carried on promoting the vaccine campaign.

They even remained quiet when their own statistics revealed that the increase in deaths in 2022 resulted from the tragic deaths of children and young adults.

Deaths of children aged between 0 and 14 increased by eight times from the end of August!

The note below is now on the EuroMOMO website! (source EuroMOMO).

Supreme Court Judgement

There are good people fighting against the perpetrators of the biggest crime against humanity, although it may have gone unnoticed, one such person is Robert F. Kennedy Jr. who won his case against all the pharmaceutical lobbyists in a Supreme Court ruling.

The Supreme court, which is the highest court in the United States, confirmed that Covid vaccines are not in fact vaccines. and the damage caused by Covid mRNA gene therapies is irreparable.

As the decision has been made by the Supreme Court there can be no further appeals and the appeals have been exhausted. Robert F. Kennedy emphasized in an initial statement that this was a success that was only possible thanks to the international cooperation of a large number of lawyers and scientists.

We can only hope that this judgment has an effect internationally.

In certain countries such as Switzerland where there is a constitution and article 118b prohibits the misuse of genetic engineering in humans and is prohibited in accordance with Article 119 of the Constitution federal. Additionally, Article 230 bis of the Criminal Code is added which state that the perpetrators risk up to 10 years in prison.

Informed Consent and The Nuremberg Code

Although we might expect basic morals and ethics to override the quest for medical knowledge, evidently not following the atrocities of human experimentation in WWII. It was revealed that no international law or informal statement differentiated between legal and illegal human experimentation at that time, therefore there was a need for guidelines and principles which were created in the form of the Nuremberg Code. With 10 principles the Code was based on beneficence and the moral duty of medical practitioners to promote the course of action they believe is in the best interests of the patient, and nonmaleficence, a principle which asserts an obligation not to inflict harm intentionally.

These are the moral, legal and ethical concepts that the Nuremberg Code states must be observed along with the legal doctrine of informed consent. Arguably, leaders worldwide including governments and health organisations did not want an informed population. Let’s face it the mRNA experiment was inflicted on frightened, vulnerable and uninformed individuals, had they been informed, would they have accepted the jab?

Despite this, our Own Government Still advises the population to vaccinate.

Crimes Against Humanity?

This recap of events over the past two years is certainly not exhaustive. We cannot forget the victims and their families who have suffered due to their trust in a corrupt system. While yes, of course, they have committed crimes against humanity, this seems to make it sound as if they committed those crimes accidentally through oversight or misunderstandings. The evidence is clear, they knew what they were doing, they ignored the suffering and are guilty of genocidal acts against the people on a massive scale.

Research by Patricia Harrity

Has the Vaccine Campaign Been a Crime Against Humanity?