THOSE FOR SAY
• These organisations were right to only give COVID Relief Aid to those countries that adhered to the preventative measures
• Lukashenko was lying

THOSE AGAINST SAY
• Lukashenko alerted us to the fact that countries were being bribed to go along with the elite’s planned agenda
• Lukashenko knew that the COVID interventions were unnecessary and harmful
• Lukashenko is more trustworthy than our government and cannot be bought

THOSE FOR THE EXERCISE SAY
• The world was unprepared for the COVID virus, it is beneficial to be prepared with strategies to stop the spread of any potentially infectious diseases early on
• The fact that the fictitious pandemic was Monkypox and there was allegedly a worrying spread of Monkeypox a few months later, shows that these key players know what they are doing and were right to get prepared

THOSE AGAINST SAY
• It was a rehearsal for the pre-planned monkeypox outbreak that was announced a few months later
• The exercise was said to have had ‘key players’ and representatives from the Wellcome Trust and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation among others who have now shown themselves to have a vested interest in overexaggerated outbreaks and diseases

THOSE FOR SAY
• Putin has reacted to the broken promises of NATO who have continued to expand eastward
• Russia must protect its citizens from the effects of American Biolabs installed on their borders
• NATO surrounds Russia’s borders with nuclear missiles, the USA has shown they would have reacted if it was the other way round

THOSE AGAINST SAY
• Putin is a “Warmongering Bully” who is attempting to dominate Europe by force
• Ukraine is a threatened democracy and NATO supports them and is no threat to Russia
• NATO is there to safeguard its members from Putin and his aggressive land grabs

THOSE FOR SAY
• The Government has employed experts, we trust their scientific findings
• The PCR tests were not flawed, I tested positive when I had COVID, as did my friends and family etc
• Conspiracy theorists are spreading dangerous misinformation, and the Mail Online is irresponsible for even repeating their nonsense!

THOSE AGAINST SAY
• It is long overdue; the Mail is guilty of biased publishing
• Despite the fact that PCR tests inflated “cases” exponentially, the Mail Online added to the incitement of fear in the country
• The Mail has reported only that which has been spoon-fed to them by the government and ignored other scientific opposition, this is normally only observed in dictatorships.

THOSE FOR SAY
• There is a pledge to make the future world more resilient, more sustainable and more inclusive (source)
• Global change can come faster bringing us 21st and 22nd century technology
• We will be happy according to Klaus Schwab (source)

THOSE AGAINST SAY
• We will own nothing
• A top-down governance plans to make digital identities a necessity, allowing complete control over our finances and ultimately control over our “transhuman” lives (source)
• Digital ID’s and surveillance will mean the end of our privacy, human rights, and civil liberties as we know them

THOSE FOR SAY
• The act received royal assent on the 25th of March 2020 (source)
• Governmental powers were granted to limit the transmission of COVID
• Interventions were to ease the burden on public health services
• Those economically affected, received assistance (source)

THOSE AGAINST SAY
• The act was rushed through parliament, without a vote
• Police received extra powers and could detain individuals deemed “infectious”
• Interventions proved harmful and human rights and freedoms were violated
• Parallels were observed with the Holocaust according to survivors

THOSE FOR SAY
• The College of Policing are ensuring consistency across England and Wales when using live facial recognition (LFR) technology
• LFR can find missing individuals or those potentially at risk of harm
• Criminals wanted by the police can be located by surveillance and subsequently arrested (source)

THOSE AGAINST SAY
• Sensitive data is collected indiscriminately when simply in range of the camera
• Possible data protection issues and human rights violations, particularly for children
• The LFR algorithms could be biased and lead to unfair treatment of an individual’s data

• Dystopian “Big Brother” style surveillance system

THOSE FOR SAY
• Approximately 200 epidemic events occur annually and are increasing
• Epidemics are disruptive to health, economies, and society
• Event 201 examined the global preparedness and capabilities to respond to such an event (source)

THOSE AGAINST SAY
• COVID pandemic was declared just 3 months later (source)
• Striking similarities were seen: the use of a coronavirus spread from animals, the lockdowns, censorship of opposition, and disruption of peaceful protests
• Was Event 201 just a rehearsal for a planned pandemic?